Disk image tool progress - Counter-intuitive header population

While preparing to implement a disk image creation tool I built a few tools for reading files from inside disk images. In the process I wrote some code for parsing the various disk and partition header structures present in a disk image. Now that I’m actually generating images of my own, I need to populate headers in the images.

The most obvious way to do this is to populate the fields of the same header type that I previously parsed from disk images when reading files from them, and then have some additional code for serializing the header type into the disk image in whatever format the GPT or FAT protocols expect.

After going a little way down this path I stopped and tried an alternative, where I write header information directly in its serialized form to a buffer, and then parse it back out with my existing header parsers, purely as a sanity check. There are two benefits to this approach. The first is the sanity check

• I’ve tested the header parsing code on real disk images and have some degree of confidence that it works. In addition to parsing values from disk headers, it also performs some validation, such as checking checksums. Writing the disk header directly and parsing it back means I can check that the header I’m writing to disk is valid.

The second benefit is less code. Were I to populate a struct with header fields, and then serialize it, I’d have 3 places where each field is listed out in the code - parsing headers, populating header structs, and serializing header structs. As it is now, there are only two - parsing headers, and writing header fields.